beook

Getestete Version: 8.3.6

The beook app is a platform for all kinds of digital teaching material content from various publishers and educational institutions. In addition to reading, the app allows you to add your own notes, follow links, solve interactive tasks and much more.

Overall assessment of the app beook

Overall assessment: Insufficient accessibility.

Full name: beook
Publisher: ionesoft GmbH
Publisher country: CH
Informationen about the app
Tested version: 8.3.6
Operating system: iOS
Overall assessment normalised: 0.6
– Share of accessibility profile: 0.3 (50% out of 0.6)
– Share of feasibility grade: 0.3 (50% out of 0.6)
Valuation information
The assessments and ratings relate exclusively to the version 8.3.6 of the app tested by us in the period from June to August 2023.

Accessibility profile

Tabelle Aspekte des Accessibility-Profil

Aspect Rating
Mobile operability 5 out of 5 points
Keyboard operability 2 out of 5 points
Voice control 4.5 out of 5 points
Compatibility with user agents 1.5 out of 5 points
Assistance with interactions 3 out of 5 points
Consistency/predictability 5 out of 5 points
Semantic structure 2.5 out of 5 points
Comprehensibility 4.5 out of 5 points
Display flexibility 2.5 out of 5 points
Contrast and sensory characteristics 2 out of 5 points
Non-text content graphics 4 out of 5 points
Multimedia alternatives No rating
Average value 3 out of 5 points
The maximum achievable score is 5 points.
  • Mobile operability: Usability and full display of content in portrait and landscape format; pointing actions and operability by device movement possible with conventional input methods.
  • Keyboard operability: Interactive elements can only be operated with a keyboard and are highlighted when focused on.
  • Voice control: Controls have an accessible label that corresponds exactly to the visual description/name.
  • Compatibility with user agents: User agents and assistive technologies are informed about changes in the state of the user interface as well as status messages.
  • Assistance with interactions: Interaction with forms; pointer entries can be cancelled or undone.
  • Consistency/predictability: Consistent navigation; context remains when focused in or during input.
  • Semantic structure: Content is labelled with structural elements such as headings, lists and labels that reflect the context of meaning.
  • Comprehensibility: Headings, form labels and link texts are understandable, correct language declaration is used.
  • Display flexibility: The presentation of the content can be adapted to the needs of the users: text size, control over animated elements and media.
  • Contrast and sensory characteristics: Adequate contrasts, no expressions such as ‘in the picture on the right’ or ‘click the red button’; information is not conveyed solely by colour.
  • Non-text content (graphics): Informative graphic elements have useful alternative texts.
  • Multimedia alternatives Multimedia content is compatible with at least one alternative sensory channel.
Value range Meaning
4.5 to 5 points Good accessibility
4 points Conditional accessibility
3 to 3.5 points Insufficient accessibility
0 to 2.5 points Poor accessibility

Diagramm Aspekte Accessibility-Profil

Presentation of accessibility by type of limitation

Type of restriction Degree of compliance
Motor skills 71%
Sight 58%
Hearing 25%
Cognition 61%

Feasibility of use scenarios

Grade
3.7
The highest grade is 6.

Key findings

The main navigation and book navigation of the beook app are difficult to distinguish from one another visually. The contrasts are not sufficient everywhere. Another point of criticism with regard to the use of colour is that marked text passages are only identified by colour and not, for example, by underlining or any other form of highlighting. People with deficient colour perception or visual impairments may be unable to recognise the marked areas or to distinguish them from one another where different colours are used. Apart from a few exceptions, the focus guidance and the labelling with alternative texts meet the requirements for accessibility. Status messages are accessible in some places, while in other places screen reader users lack important information because they can only be perceived visually (for example, a visually greyed-out element is not displayed as inactive by the screen reader). Individual functions of the app are a bit cumbersome to find, but users can use the settings area and set bookmarks with a screen reader. The embedded videos do not contain an audio description or text transcription. From the point of view of accessibility, the so-called accessibility mode is the app’s biggest point of criticism: activating accessibility mode removes the search and comment features, among other things, instead of making them accessible.

Navigate to the next or previous results


Direct links to all detailed results